at's another example
of why anything less than a /24 will generally not be guaranteed as globally
routable.
Cheers,
Em
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Minimum BGP Address Aggregation
If you are still thinking in terms of class C and half class C, you
are not ready to plan BGP multihoming. You _must_ start thinking in
CIDR terms.
>I was told by an ISP that the minimum address aggregation acceptable on the
>Internet is a single class C address space. Is this correct?
No, it
Howard,
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:v0422087fb5d03ca65021@[63.216.127.98]...
> >I was told by an ISP that the minimum address aggregation acceptable on
the
> >Internet is a single class C address space. Is this correct?
>
> No, it is not. It is the minimum
>Howard,
>
>""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:v0422087fb5d03ca65021@[63.216.127.98]...
>
> > >I was told by an ISP that the minimum address aggregation acceptable on
>the
> > >Internet is a single class C address space. Is this correct?
> >
> > No, it is not.
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:v04220882b5d05ad06a2b@[63.216.127.98]...
> >What do you mean by "may NOT be globally routable" ? This would be due to
> >the address aggregation on the the 1st Tier ISP ? Would this be a
problem
> >even if I'm connected to a 1st T
5 matches
Mail list logo
