RE: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]

So if you have a router with S0 to the outside and e0 to the inside. Suppose you have an inside network of 10.10.10.0/24, where 10.10.10.30 is your webserver. Suppose the IP addres of S0 is 172.16.0.1 ip nat inside source list 2 interface serial 0 overload ip nat inside source static tcp

Re: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]

This can be done also. With PixOS version 6.0.x or higher this can be done static (inside,outside) tcp 1.1.1.1 80 192.168.1.1 80 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 80 access-group 100 permit in interface outside Having said that, I prefer CheckPoint because

RE: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]

Static translations with ports: Example: ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.1 25 171.69.232.209 25 Make a search on ip nat inside source static tcp - you'll find quite a few examples... -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com]