Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> At 6:16 PM + 8/12/02, John Neiberger wrote:
> >Good point! Forgive me, I'd only had one cup of coffee when I
> wrote
> >that. Usually I need at least three before my explainer works
> >correctly.
> >
> >John
>
>
> You bring up an interesting question. Coul
At 4:14 PM -0400 8/12/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Did you see the movie Pi? :)
>
No, but I like pi with coffee. It's just rarely on my blueprint...I
mean, diet.
>
>At 6:16 PM + 8/12/02, John Neiberger wrote:
>>Good point! Forgive me, I'd only had one cup of coffee when I wrote
>>that.
Hmmm, that explains why my explianer is unexplainable, I don't like
coffee :)
Dave
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>
> At 6:16 PM + 8/12/02, John Neiberger wrote:
> >Good point! Forgive me, I'd only had one cup of coffee when I wrote
> >that. Usually I need at least three before my explain
ct: Re: OSI...Please help...
[7:51235]
Sent
by:
nobody@groupst
At 6:16 PM + 8/12/02, John Neiberger wrote:
>Good point! Forgive me, I'd only had one cup of coffee when I wrote
>that. Usually I need at least three before my explainer works
>correctly.
>
>John
You bring up an interesting question. Could we have predicted our
industry crash by monitor
Good point! Forgive me, I'd only had one cup of coffee when I wrote
that. Usually I need at least three before my explainer works
correctly.
John
>>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 8/12/02 11:39:12 AM >>>
At 4:35 PM + 8/12/02, John Neiberger wrote:
>You're putting too much thought into this. :-
At 4:35 PM + 8/12/02, John Neiberger wrote:
>You're putting too much thought into this. :-) The ip keyword will
>match any ip packet regardless of the transport layer protocol being
>used. You use the tcp, udp, and icmp keywords when you want to be even
>more specific.
>
>HTH,
>John
>
the first one specifies tcp and the second one includes any upper protocols
encapsulated in ip packets.
- Original Message -
From: "maine dude"
To:
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:16 PM
Subject: OSI...Please help... [7:51235]
> Please help... In the example :access-list 101 deny tcp
=?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote:
>
> Please help... In the example :access-list 101 deny tcp host
> 172.16.3.10 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq ftp access-list 101 permit
> ip any any Do the terms "tcp" and "ip" refer to the individual
> protocols or the stack ?
They refer to the protocols. Don't w
You're putting too much thought into this. :-) The ip keyword will
match any ip packet regardless of the transport layer protocol being
used. You use the tcp, udp, and icmp keywords when you want to be even
more specific.
HTH,
John
>>> "maine dude" 8/12/02 10:16:19 AM >>>
Please help... In t
10 matches
Mail list logo
