Re: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]

2002-04-25 Thread Anthony Pace
I think the VL must be defined on both routers using each others RID not just any arbitraray interface) In your case maybe the time it worked just happened to be when you defined the link with the RID. Anthony Pace ""Jeremy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My qu

Re: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]

2002-04-25 Thread Chuck
In the world of OSPF, the virtual link end points are the router RID's This is defined in the RFC. with virtual links, the hello packet has the V bit set to 1. I believe that the TTL of the IP packet transporting the VL hello is set to 255. In any case, virtual link hellos are forwarded until suc

RE: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565]

2002-04-26 Thread Jeremy
As far as joining discontiguous nonzero areas, I would be interested to see the configs... -Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Virtual-links [7:42565