Re: OSPF and frame relay issues

2001-03-08 Thread Nigel Taylor
Robert, Ok... I think we all at one time beat our heads on those "work stations" came close to going mad on this one... Welcome to the club.. think policy-based routing at the hub HTH Nigel - Original Message - From: McCallum, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Ccie

RE: OSPF and frame relay issues

2001-03-08 Thread Kevin Mahler
You are on the right track. Router 3 does need to be the DR but router's 4 and 5 need to NOT be a BDR. Also you will need neighbor statements. You can put the priority on the neighbor statement. So router 1 has a priority of say 90 and routers 4 and 5 have a priority of 0 to keep them from eve

RE: OSPF and frame relay issues

2001-03-08 Thread HENDERSON_DAVE_G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/08/01 08:03 AM Please respond to Kevin Mahler To: "'Ccielab' (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:RE

RE: OSPF and frame relay issues

2001-03-08 Thread Chuck Larrieu
5:03 AM To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail) Subject: RE: OSPF and frame relay issues You are on the right track. Router 3 does need to be the DR but router's 4 and 5 need to NOT be a BDR. Also you will need neighbor statements. You can put the

RE: OSPF and frame relay issues

2001-03-08 Thread Alan Basinger
o@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail) Subject: RE: OSPF and frame relay issues This brings to mind a question I have about the neighbor priority statement. According to the Doc CD, the default value for neighbor priority is 0 I have on a couple of recent labs entered neighbor a.b.c.d and when doing a show r