Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Gibberish in email [7:74740]
Reimer, Fred wrote:
It is an attempt by the SPAMers to avoid SPAM software that
takes a hash of
the SPAM and blocks SPAM on machines based
.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Gibberish in email [7:74740]
Reimer, Fred wrote:
It is an attempt by the SPAMers to avoid SPAM software that
takes a hash of
the SPAM
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Gibberish in email [7:74740]
Reimer, Fred wrote:
It is an attempt by the SPAMers to avoid SPAM software that
takes a hash of
the SPAM and blocks SPAM on machines based on these hash
values
on every
9x client.
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Gibberish in email [7:74740]
There's a compelling argument for scheduled virus and spyware
scans/updates..
Brian
The path
]
Subject: RE: OT Gibberish in email [7:74740]
There's a compelling argument for scheduled virus and spyware
scans/updates..
Brian
The path to a desireable destination
is often more difficult than the path to stay where you are.
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Wilmes, Rusty wrote:
I've been trying
It's an effort by the spammer to change the signature (checksum) of the
spam email by inserting random characters. It gets around spam filters
which use a signature/checksum technique. I believe the open source
Vipul's Razor uses signatures.
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From:
It is an attempt by the SPAMers to avoid SPAM software that takes a hash of
the SPAM and blocks SPAM on machines based on these hash values. There are
some anti-SPAM solutions out there that basically relies on the users to
mark email as SPAM. When they do, the client machines send the hash of
7 matches
Mail list logo
