RE: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523]

2003-01-22 Thread Symon Thurlow
Thanks for your reply, I should have mentioned that the best solution need not be the cheapest. Cheers, Symon -Original Message- From: charles riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2003 03:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523] I like

RE: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523]

2003-01-22 Thread Symon Thurlow
What about Cisco Secure IDS? -Original Message- From: charles riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2003 03:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523] I like the various SNORT products...non-proprietary (or as close as this field gets). SNORT

Re: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523]

2003-01-22 Thread Sam Sneed
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2003 03:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523] I like the various SNORT products...non-proprietary (or as close as this field gets). SNORT looks good (www.snort.org) And if you don't have time to build your

Re: OT well, sort of - IDS [7:61523]

2003-01-21 Thread charles riley
I like the various SNORT products...non-proprietary (or as close as this field gets). SNORT looks good (www.snort.org) And if you don't have time to build your own, try: www.sourcfire.com www.silicondefense.com Heck, even Packet Alarm may be an option though you will not find any contact