Re: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-02 Thread Nigel Taylor
Chuck, Thanks... for another great post. Maybe we could get Paul to make this standard reading for all who join the list, this way we avoid what we all fear...I dare not say the letters..for they spell "fear" themselves.. Of course the letter I refer to are NDA! This definitely is

Re: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-03 Thread Ken Diliberto
Chuck, There are still some very large Token Ring installations, although I don't know why. I would think it would be cheaper to phase it out during regular maintenance. As for forward looking? I don't think that's what the CCIE is for. CCIE means you know (or should know) what you are doing w

Re: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Token Ring is still on the written because Cisco doesn't seem to have the resources to update the test?? Is it still on the lab? (Or can't you tell me because of NDA?) ;-) I haven't run into a Token Ring shop that wasn't planning to update to Ethernet in a long time. But that "planning to upda

RE: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-04 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
ow it's on the test so buck-up and learn it :) My $0.02 Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 8:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244] T

Re: Off Topic - CCIE LAB and NDA [7:34244]

2002-02-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Jun 25, 7:08pm, "Chuck Larrieu" wrote: } } before I shut down for the evening, a few random thoughts on the CCIE Lab } and NDA. Inspired by several posts here of late from persons asking about } topology, IOS versions, or speaking of rumors about equipment changes. } } 1) It is unclear what r