Assume that you want to access every host on 10.1.1.0
from network 205.11.1.0 with the source address tranlasted
to 10.1.1.100 , then I don`t think it is possible with a PIX.
A router would be able to do such requirement.
> That is Very very Urgent!!!Please Help!!!
> Does anyone know that Can Ci
The url
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/mailserver_in.html
access-list smtp permit tcp any host 209.164.3.5 eq smtp
access-group smtp in interface outside
static (inside,outside) 209.164.3.5 192.168.2.57 netmask 255.255.255.255
gives a good example of pushing smtp from the outside to the in
Ivan,
This is a shot in the dark, but here is what I am
seeing scanning through my PIX book:
NAT,GLOBAL commands are out because they require
inside to outside commands.
STATIC appears to be outbound only as well
ROUTE appears that it could work and allows the
if_name to be internal or externa
Yes but there are caveats. You cannot do an all inclusive static mapping to
a PAT interface but you can redirect certain traffic based on port to
specific inside hosts.
For example, if you only have a single outside address and you are using it
on your outside interface, not only can you use PAT
What he wants do do works fine. The static command works both ways.. Use
the static to define to ip and the port. I use this myself.
""Leslie McIntosh"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> Ivan,
>
> This is a shot in the dark, but here is what I am
> seeing scanning through my PIX book
Sorry, misunderstood. Excuse the BW I spilled. Next time better.
Martijn
_
Chat on line met vrienden en probeer MSN Messenger uit:
http://messenger.msn.nl
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37067&t
6 matches
Mail list logo
