PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Timo Graser
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 7:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
The Pix has also a browser interface. The only disadvantage in the past
was, that you could not configure a vpn. With the new pdm you will be
able to do this too
, 2002 2:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
Timo- Which version of the PDM are you referring to that has the VPN config
capability??
I have 1.1.2 now, and I have not found that functionality... Am I just
overlooking something!?!?!
TIA for your response.
-Mark Odette
solution if you're running CheckPoint. As X said, never run your
firewall on NT!!
Jeffrey Reed
Classic Networking, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of nrf
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX VS
As long as you're into comparing vendors, you might want to take a look at
Netscreen. the published data indicates it is every bit as fast, if not
faster, than PIX and has a GUI interface every bit as convenient as
Checkpoint.
It is also a whole lot less expensive than either.
Jeffrey Reed
I have setup and managed both PIX and Checkpoint in a
variety of environments. I think they are both solid
options in different situations. Here is how I market
these products.
PIX
- more cost effective
- fast
- you can have fail over
- Can be more complicated to setup the CLI, but PIX
has a
Dear x,
I love your presentation. You spoke well.
Nurudeen
x wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have setup and managed both PIX and Checkpoint in a
variety of environments. I think they are both solid
options in different situations. Here is how I market
On the other hand, there's a distinct third option, which is to run
Checkpoint on a dedicated hardware appliance, for example the Nokia Ipso
line of gear. This removes one of the Checkpoint disadvantages (don't need
to know Unix or NT), but introduces another disadvantage (less flexible -
you
Hi
Nokia?s IPSO OS is Unix. It?s a ?hardened? and customize version of
FreeBSD. I?ve worked on Nokia/CheckPoint boxes and it does help to have
knowledge of Unix. I have not had the chance to work with PIX yet so I
can?t comment on the merits of a CheckPoint/Nokia vs. PIX. The only
negative
, I'm really a PIX person so don't get the wrong impression.
;-)
Rik
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
On the other hand, there's a distinct third option, which
I knew somebody was going to come back with that. All-right fine, it is
indeed true that Ipso is a hacked version of Unix. But then again, so is
Cisco IOS and Juniper JunOS, and you could say that it helps to have
knowledge of Unix to run either of those (especially JunOS).The point I
was
, April 02, 2002 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
On the other hand, there's a distinct third option, which is to run
Checkpoint on a dedicated hardware appliance, for example the Nokia Ipso
line of gear. This removes one of the Checkpoint disadvantages (don't
: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]
I knew somebody was going to come back with that. All-right fine, it is
indeed true that Ipso is a hacked version of Unix. But then again, so is
Cisco IOS and Juniper JunOS, and you could say that it helps to have
knowledge of Unix to run either of those (especially
12 matches
Mail list logo
