I never knew the pix was even capable of VLAN's
>>> "Bates, Steven (SIGNAL)" 02/06/02 03:03PM >>>
Has anyone heard of the PIX having problems passing tagged packets as in
dot1q and how about ISL? I did some testing before with the Lucent Brick
and it could not deal with tagged packets. I k
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix and vlan [7:34663]
I never knew the pix was even capable of VLAN's
>>> "Bates, Steven (SIGNAL)" 02/06/02 03:03PM >>>
Has anyone heard of the PIX having problems passing tagged packets as in
dot1q and how about ISL? I did some testing
m: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Pix and vlan [7:34663]
>
>
> I never knew the pix was even capable of VLAN's
>
> >>> "Bates, Steven (SIGNAL)" 02/06/02 03:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix and vlan [7:34663]
I have my PIX 520 interfaces hanging of a 6509 in multiple VLANs with no
issues.
But doesn't traffic get tagged only when it crosses a trunk or the switch
fabric?
what scenario you have that you would want to pass
tagged
> packets outside of the PIX? The only scenario I can think of is you are
> using a PIX between LANs. Is this correct?
>
> Rik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wed
5 matches
Mail list logo
