Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-07 Thread Allen May
What's the timeout set to for TTL on these suckers? - Original Message - From: EA Louie To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:41 PM Subject: Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] I want nothing to do with the dropped bits from RFC 1149. thank you very much -e- - Original Message

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-07 Thread Chuck Larrieu
:Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] What's the timeout set to for TTL on these suckers? - Original Message - From: EA Louie To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:41 PM Subject: Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] I want nothing to do with the dropped bits from RFC 1149. thank you very much

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-07 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
As the security experts can tell you, the basis of all security implementation (once you get the policy defined) is accountability and audit. RFC 1149 facilities come equipped with built-in audit trails. Other advantages are that the medium increases its capacity for some time between

Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-07 Thread KY
, eagles, or hunters along the route. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allen May Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] What's the timeout set to for TTL on these suckers? -

Re: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-07 Thread Allen May
Yeah and I mentioned earlier that if the cage breaks open you'd have a horrible broadcast storm. - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Allen May ; Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:47 AM Subject: RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] I would imagine that the TTL is in inverse

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Something only Linux fanatics would do. Obviously they have too much time on their hands. ( among other things now ;- ) ( flames to /dev/null ) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread sdonoho
I hope RFC 1149 isn't covered in the CCIE lab exam! Scott Donoho CCNP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] Hi All Checkout

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian Dennis
pigeon-cache Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (925) 260-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sdonoho Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RFC 1149

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
I hope RFC 1149 isn't covered in the CCIE lab exam! There is substantial anecdotal evidence that the second day often covers the candidate with dropped RFC1149 packets. Scott Donoho CCNP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] If you go into the CCIE lab and see a pigeon loft in your rack you're just out of luck I guess. I wonder what the config would look like for it. interface Pigeon 0/0 encapsulation feather ip address 172.16.1.1

RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244]

2001-05-04 Thread ElephantChild
Multiple Trailing Unsavories features. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dennis Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RFC 1149 is in use [7:3244] If you go into the CCIE lab and see