RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Carter
Sorry, wanted to add some information about OSPF behaiour and secondary addresses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327] Just wanted

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Carter
ndary addresses. This is about the only good time to use redistribute connected. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Logan, Harold Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-10 Thread Logan, Harold
Interesting... thanks for the explanation Chuck. Hal > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327] > > >

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-09 Thread Chuck Larrieu
vty 0 4 > password cisco > login > ! > end hth, Hal > -Original Message- > From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-07 Thread Logan, Harold
co > login > ! > end hth, Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327] > > > I'm not su

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-06 Thread Kane, Christopher A.
ssage- From: Chuck Larrieu To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/6/01 5:45 PM Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327] try using loopbacks instead of secondaries. Are your secondary addresses part of the RIP process via network statements? same subnet boundary as the primary address?

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-06 Thread Daniel Cotts
May I suggest that instead of using secondary addresses create some loopback interfaces on each router. Assign your test networks to those interfaces. Under router rip configure a network statement for all networks on that router. > -Original Message- > From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]

2001-12-06 Thread Chuck Larrieu
try using loopbacks instead of secondaries. Are your secondary addresses part of the RIP process via network statements? same subnet boundary as the primary address? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of anil Sent: Thursday, December 06,