), the problem would be
solved. Had you ever thought about using EIGRP ???
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Rashid Lohiya
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: RIPv2 vs. RIP [7:3404]
> Quote from Routing TCP/IP Jeff Doyle, Pg 281:
>
> Subnet masks carried with each
Quote from Routing TCP/IP Jeff Doyle, Pg 281:
Subnet masks carried with each route entry
Authentication of routing updates
Next-hop addresses carried with each route entry
External route tags
Multicast route updates
I remember these by memorising the word/abbreviation S.A.N.E.M.
Hope this helps
Jason,
As I already stated, RIPv1 doesn't support VLSM, but RIPv2 does.
""Jason"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Why are you trying to migrate if you don't know the differences ?
>
> ""Thomas"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
Don't we all know the answer to that.
Everyplace I've worked confuses its objectives with its techniques.
If (when) it goes wrong, we can use the Nuremberg defence.
Hugo
""Jason"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Why are you trying to migrate if you don't know the d
ime. I'll have to dig out my notes.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:46 PM
> To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RIPv2 vs. RIP [7:3404]
>
>
> R
sting structure, and
understanding the desired result.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Circusnuts
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RIPv2 vs. RIP [7:3404]
WOW- good question !!! RIP Vers
:46 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RIPv2 vs. RIP [7:3404]
RIPv2 also supports discontinuous networks (no auto-summary) and the ability
to do summarization (ip summary-address rip).
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMA
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RIPv2 vs. RIP [7:3404]
>
>
> VLSM is the major one. RIPv2 also supports authentication. It's been a
> while, and I forget the other ones. Well, a quick browse of RFC 2453
> indicates in general - that's it. RIPv2 uses the multic
WOW- good question !!! RIP Version 1 picks the configured interface Subnet
Mask to define it's Classful Network. RIP version 2 is Classless & carries
the Subnet Mask in it's updates. I have redistributed RIP Version 1 into
OSPF, but I'm not sure that knowledge totally applies. I wonder if ver
VLSM is the major one. RIPv2 also supports authentication. It's been a
while, and I forget the other ones. Well, a quick browse of RFC 2453
indicates in general - that's it. RIPv2 uses the multicast address of
224.0.0.9, rather than the broadcast address of 255.255.255.255
A RIPv2 router will res
8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: RIPv2 vs. RIP [7:3404]
Why are you trying to migrate if you don't know the differences ?
""Thomas"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All - What's the main feature of
Why are you trying to migrate if you don't know the differences ?
""Thomas"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All - What's the main feature of RIPv2 over RIPv1, beside the VLSM? I
am
> trying to migrate to RIPv2, but some devices only support RIPv1. Is there
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
