, can anybody tell me
what problem it will cause based on reading this article?
Thanks
Kent
- Original Message -
From: "Lupi, Guy"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: Route Reflectors & Peer-Group [7:46464]
> Hunt is right, on the web they do say tha
EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject: Re: Route Reflectors & Peer-Group [7:46464]
*
*
*Can you point to the pages where you saw this on BGP 4 command
*reference. I
*couldn't find any thing to that effect. I took the CBCR class
*and we used
*peer groups with Reflectors, it seemed to work fine.
*"&q
Can you point to the pages where you saw this on BGP 4 command reference. I
couldn't find any thing to that effect. I took the CBCR class and we used
peer groups with Reflectors, it seemed to work fine.
""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I have re
I'm using peer-groups with route-reflectors on different Cisco platforms
(2500, 7500, 12000) and it works fine !!
--
Stephane LITKOWSKI
Student in a French computer science school
EPITA Telecom & Network specialization
CCNA + CCNP
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
""Hunt Lee"" a icrit dans le message d
Route Reflection within peer groups is a common practise.
At 11:26 AM 6/13/2002 -0400, Hunt Lee wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have read both BGP 4 Command & Reference + CCNP Building Scable Cisco
>Networks, they both state that peer-group and route reflectors are not
>compatible to each other. Yet, when I tr
5 matches
Mail list logo
