Hi Evan,
Ospf is like 6 equal cost paths and EIGRP is like 4 equal or unequal cost
paths. EIGRP is more flexible to have unequal load balancing.
Cu
Geert Hampe
CCNP+Voice+ATM CCDP
Evan You <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
001001bff708$38afaf20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:001001bff708$38afaf20$
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Evan You wrote:
> What is the maximum number of equal-path equal-cost load sharing / balancing
> will OSPF or EIGRP do?
6 i believe, and I believe 4 is the default.
Brian
>
> Basically, I have 12 T1 circuits that I am thinking of load-sharing between
> two Data Centers.
or E3 internationally (I
know, I work for WorldCom).
- Evan
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 11:02 AM
To: Cisco Mail List; Evan You
Subject: RE: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
Evan, at some point you might want to
I believe the no# is 6
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Evan You <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:48 AM
Subject: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
> What is the maximum number of equal-path equal-cost load sharing /
balancing
> will OSPF or EIGRP do
Evan, at some point you might want to look beyond single circuits. An
alternative might be to aggregate your bandwidth by having your carrier
terminate it as ATM, and populate your routers with IMA cards to give you
bandwidth. Fractional DS3 should be a lot less expensive and gives you a lot
more
5 matches
Mail list logo
