You asked that question right when I had EtherPeek running on my PC.
So, the answer is:
0180.c200.
Source and Destination SAP: 0x42 :-) See? The answer *is* 42!
>>> "Randy Lopez" 11/16/01 2:27:57 PM >>>
What Multicast address does STP use?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupst
Here's one way to find it:
Bill_Cat5505> (enable) sh cam system
* = Static Entry. + = Permanent Entry. # = System Entry. R = Router Entry. X
= Port Security Entry
VLAN Dest MAC/Route Des Destination Ports or VCs / [Protocol Type]
--
Look here (watch for wordwrap).
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1214ea1/3550scg/sw
stp.htm#xtocid1286915
Hth,
Ole
~~~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~
Thanks alot guys, for your help...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26546&t=26538
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
Randy Lopez wrote:
>
> What Multicast address does STP use?
>
Since spanning tree is a layer 2 protocol,
why would it use any multicast address? STP
is used between directly connected switches
and uses BPDU packets, flooded out all ports
for set up. Not multicast.
http://www.cisco.com/warp
]
Subject: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:26538]
Randy Lopez wrote:
>
> What Multicast address does STP use?
>
Since spanning tree is a layer 2 protocol,
why would it use any multicast address? STP
is used between directly connected switches
and uses BPDU packets, flooded out all ports
f
At 04:55 PM 11/16/01, John Neiberger wrote:
>You asked that question right when I had EtherPeek running on my PC.
>So, the answer is:
>
>0180.c200.
>
>Source and Destination SAP: 0x42 :-) See? The answer *is* 42!
According to Radia Perlman, the IEEE chose this SAP on purpose. ;-)
>
Someone was a Douglas Adams fan?
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:26538]
At 04:55 PM 11/16/01, John Neiberger wrote:
>You asked that quest
-
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:27 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:26538]
>
>
>At 04:55 PM 11/16/01, John Neiberger wrote:
> >You asked that question right when I had EtherPe
Interesting, but why is the word palindrome non-palindromic?
When I calculate 42 in Binary I get:
128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 = 42 Decimal
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 = reversed order o
a
> palindrome (the
> same backwards and forwards in binary) and avoided the Little
> Endian/ Big
> Endian wars!
>
> Priscilla
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:
://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~
-Original Message-
From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:26538]
Interesting, but why is the word palindrome non-palindromic?
When
rds in binary) and avoided the Little
> > Endian/ Big
> > Endian wars!
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:27 PM
>
et several hits - the Big-Endian/Little-Endian question has been
well-discussed because of its impact on certain DLSw/bridging issues.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Drew Simonis
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:26538]
At 10:12 PM 11/16/01, Kane, Christopher A. wrote:
>Someone was a Douglas Adams fan?
Of course! Also another cool thing about 42 is that it's a palindrome (the
same backwards and forwards in binary) and avoided the Little E
This is a computer architecture topic and it has been a while for
me, so please feel free to correct me. Basically, it is how multibyte
values are stored in a particular computer architecture. For instance, in
big endian, the "last byte, has the most significant byte", and in little
endian t
Because it would be palindnilap, and it's a bugger to pronounce.
""Jim Dixon"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Interesting, but why is the word palindrome non-palindromic?
> When I calculate 42 in Binary I get:
> 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1
> 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
>
> 0 0
f.com
~~~
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:26538]
Because it would be palind
a Ethernet multicast address differs
from a token ring multicast address. Exercise 2: how is an Ethernet address
of 0100.5E00.0001 (IP 224.0.0.1) read in on a token ring machine? Is the IP
address still read the same?
WAYNE BAETY, MCSE, A1C, USAF
Network Systems Trainer
-Original Message-----
F
19 matches
Mail list logo
