Message-
> From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]
>
>
> That would make alot of sense =)
>
> What was I thinking.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]
That would make alot of sense =)
What was I thinking... . I guess that would be
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]
That would make alot of sense =)
What was I thinking... . I guess that would be stupid to block ALL
ports everytime something new was
oking and see what you come up with.
> > \
> > -Peter Slow
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Sp
twork set up with defaults.
> >
> > wait a few minutes bofore looking and see what you come up with.
> > \
> > -Peter Slow
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:3
ngs start
> blocking.
> convergence takes like 50 seconds on a network set up with defaults.
>
> wait a few minutes bofore looking and see what you come up with.
> \
> -Peter Slow
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
~*BLIP*~ things start
> > blocking.
> > convergence takes like 50 seconds on a network set up with defaults.
> >
> > wait a few minutes bofore looking and see what you come up with.
> > \
> > -Peter Slow
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
nton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]
>
>
> Only one end of the link will show as blocking, the other will stay as
> forwarding even though no traffic can
\
> -Peter Slow
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]
>
>
> Only one end of the link will
like 50 seconds on a network set up with defaults.
wait a few minutes bofore looking and see what you come up with.
\
-Peter Slow
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for
Only one end of the link will show as blocking, the other will stay as
forwarding even though no traffic can pass over the link.
Check the other end to see if that is blocking.
Regards,
Gaz
""Ryan Ngai Hon Kong"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I have ab
11 matches
Mail list logo
