If I were to guess I would say it is because there is no 179.70.32.13
network
Your directly connected networks are 170.something. there are no other
routes known to the router. Therefore it says "I got no idea where this
destination address is so I won't bother with it" :-
Or something like
I would agree with Chuck's statement as well.
Roman
At 06:58 PM 11/15/00 -0800, you wrote:
If I were to guess I would say it is because there is no 179.70.32.13
network
Your directly connected networks are 170.something. there are no other
routes known to the router. Therefore it says "I got
To: Lists Wizard; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
If I were to guess I would say it is because there is no 179.70.32.13
network
Your directly connected networks are 170.something. there are no other
routes known to the router. Therefore it says "
Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:10 PM
To: Jason Baker; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
Can you provide and example? I'm a bit confused as to what this
accomplishes.
Thanks
Chuck
Wizard; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
how about creating an access list..
then adding this access list to a route map.
Regards,
Jason Baker
Network Engineer
MCSE, CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
my routers. It does.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Jason Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:23 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
well what i think the problem is that t
Hi,
Before the static route goes into the main routing table, the router will
check is the next hop or the interface is reachable/available. If your next
hop is not available, such as serial interface down, the static route will
not go into the routing table.
Thanks,
At 08:13 PM 11/14/2000
7 matches
Mail list logo
