Yeah, if you ping any 127.X.X.X for a workstation, you should get a reply
from the loopback. That entire class A is reserved for loopback addresses.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35402&t=35357
--
FAQ, list archiv
If you look at 127.0.0.0 in binary, it's a class A.
""Simon Yang (ITeX)"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We know that 127.0.0.1 is for loopback.
> If we need to assing a subnet mask for it, what the number should be.
> for Class A, the noraml subnet mask is 255.0
I didn't see this come through the list so I'm re-posting.
-Original Message-
From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:01 AM
To: Cisco GroupStudy List
Subject: RE: Subnet Mask question [7:25602]
I'm assuming that you en
I'm assuming that you entered something like this in a router:
ip route 63.182.182.182 255.0.0.0
where = an interface name or IP address of a neighboring
router.
If this is an accurate assumption when you do a "show run" you'll probably
see the following instead:
ip route 63.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
om: Brian Lodwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: Subnet mask question..
> Brian,
>I hate the way these tests word their questions sometimes. Why don't
they
> just state the mask as it should be -contig
Behalf Of
Brian Lodwick
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subnet mask question..
Brian,
I hate the way these tests word their questions sometimes. Why don't they
just state the mask as it should be -contiguous bits left to right(except
for wildcard
Brian,
I hate the way these tests word their questions sometimes. Why don't they
just state the mask as it should be -contiguous bits left to right(except
for wildcard masks ofcourse). If they are going to state the subnet portion
is stealing 11 bits from the host portion of the address why
This is a matter of how the question was phrased.
If a class B address had 11 bits of subnetting, then the mask is
255.255.255.224. Why?
Because a class B address has NO bits of subnetting to begin with. You
take the binary,
..., and to that you add 11 bits, and
Default netmask for class B is 255.255.0.0 with 11 subnet mask you will
have /27
ie 255.255.255.224
it's bit confusing though..
Nobody
Keith Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question still gets
> me.
: Neil Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 October 2000 13:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subnet mask question..
I thought that was strange when I first saw a question like that. Oh Well,
Cisco does things there own way.
Neil Schneider
"Keith Woodworth" <[EMAIL PROT
I thought that was strange when I first saw a question like that. Oh Well,
Cisco does things there own way.
Neil Schneider
"Keith Woodworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question stil
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jeroen Timmer wrote:
>>Well 11 bits of subnetting is : 255.255.255.224
>>
>>Class B subnet is always 255.255.x.x so 11 bits of subnetting means after
>>the first 2 255's you got 11 bits of subnetting. Wich is another 255 and
>>then 3 bits of the host adress wich comes to 22
Well 11 bits of subnetting is : 255.255.255.224
Class B subnet is always 255.255.x.x so 11 bits of subnetting means after
the first 2 255's you got 11 bits of subnetting. Wich is another 255 and
then 3 bits of the host adress wich comes to 224. So there you got your
255.255.255.224 subnet mask.
It is automatically added in NT. Do a route print and u will see the route
table on ur NT machine.
Ryan
andre wrote:
> Does anyone know how to setup a /32 bit subnet mask(ex:255.255.255.255)
> on NT? I'm using anycast and need help. I can do this on Unix, but I'm
>
> running into a wall on NT
14 matches
Mail list logo
