RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]

2003-06-11 Thread Dom
It looks like a job for Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing (CBWFQing). As you have already put a sniffer on to identify the legitimate traffic etc it should be no problem to setup. If you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me off-list. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler Zo

RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]

2003-06-11 Thread Elijah Savage
Savage; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] It looks like a job for Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing (CBWFQing). As you have already put a sniffer on to identify the legitimate traffic etc it should be no problem to setup. If you require further

RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]

2003-06-12 Thread Lupi, Guy
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] Not to mention I just realized after posting this my access-list is screwed up it should be. Access-list should actually look like this Access-list 199 permit tcp any any eq www -Original Message- From

Re: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]

2003-06-12 Thread Adam
PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559] > > It looks like a job for Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing (CBWFQing). > As you have already put a sniffer on to identify the legitimate traffic > etc it should be no problem to setup. > > If you r

RE: Traffic Shaping web traffic will this work? [7:70559]

2003-06-12 Thread Joseph Brunner
(this from my usenet post on kazaa) apply source/dest ip when making traffic shaping decisions!) the problem is the response from the user in your org to the internet is not going back over port 1214.. usually it will hit 1214 and go back like 2000 to 4000 tcp (assuming windoze boxes) your best b