At 7:06 PM + 7/21/03, alaerte Vidali wrote:
>Thanks,
>
>The challenge I am facing is to improve the OSPF design of a network that is
>in production, without changing the existing WAN links. The area 5 is bigger
>than I think it would be ideal (there are 56 routers) and there is no
>interesting
y delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Two ABRs on the same area - requirements [7:72587]
Thanks,
The challenge I am facing is to improve the OSPF design o
Thanks,
The challenge I am facing is to improve the OSPF design of a network that is
in production, without changing the existing WAN links. The area 5 is bigger
than I think it would be ideal (there are 56 routers) and there is no
interesting traffic between all the spoke routers in the area, as
ipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: "Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:11 PM
To: [EMAI
At 1:10 AM + 7/20/03, " Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter " wrote:
>""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Of course you can have more than one ABR for an area, but there is no
>single
>> "area 5" in the diagram below. There are two separate areas, that happen
>to
>> u
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip a bit
>
> In many topologies, it will get awfully expensive to have an ABR for
> each area. I did one network for a large enterprise (2500 routers
> and growing, of which 400 actively spoke OSPF).
Howard, what did the rest spea
At 11:50 PM + 7/18/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>alaerte Vidali wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> The addresses are contiguous.
>>
>> Suppose a network with many ABRs, one in each city. Any big
>> city represents small cities. Could you use an area for each
>> ABR? (I am wondering if there is
gt;
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: "Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two ABRs on the same area - requirements [7:72587]
>
> ""Reimer, Fred"&
ent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Two ABRs on the same area - requirements [7:72587]
""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't believe that is a valid design.
why not? there is nothing that says you can't hav
At 9:47 PM + 7/18/03, alaerte Vidali wrote:
>Thanks.
>
>The addresses are contiguous.
>
>Suppose a network with many ABRs, one in each city. Any big city represents
>small cities. Could you use an area for each ABR? (I am wondering if there
>is no limit in the number of areas. I bet not).
In m
At 6:27 PM + 7/18/03, alaerte Vidali wrote:
>Can you see any mistake in the following network?
>
>
>Rx ---area 5--R2area 0---R3-
>||
> area 0 |
>
At 8:18 PM + 7/18/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>I think this would work, but why would you want to do it? Why not make those
>two parts of Area 5 different areas? Simply from a documenation and human
>communication point of view, you don't want the design to be confusing. When
>someone refe
""Reimer, Fred"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't believe that is a valid design.
why not? there is nothing that says you can't have more than one ABR for an
area. In fact, there is nothing that says you can't give all your areas the
same area i.d. There can be problems in doing
alaerte Vidali wrote:
>
> Thanks.
>
> The addresses are contiguous.
>
> Suppose a network with many ABRs, one in each city. Any big
> city represents small cities. Could you use an area for each
> ABR? (I am wondering if there is no limit in the number of
> areas. I bet not).
Yes, you should us
Thanks.
The addresses are contiguous.
Suppose a network with many ABRs, one in each city. Any big city represents
small cities. Could you use an area for each ABR? (I am wondering if there
is no limit in the number of areas. I bet not).
What about put toghether two cities and form a bigger area
I think this would work, but why would you want to do it? Why not make those
two parts of Area 5 different areas? Simply from a documenation and human
communication point of view, you don't want the design to be confusing. When
someone refers to Area 5, you don't want someone else to have to say "w
I don't believe that is a valid design.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is i
17 matches
Mail list logo
