Re: VLSM Question [7:35827]

2002-02-24 Thread Hunt Lee
So does it mean on the first subent - the host range is 192.168.50.1 - 192.168.50.126, and the second subnet host range is 192.168.50.129 - 192.168.50.254? Best Regards, Hunt Lee G Z wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The 25 bit can be 0 or 1. It looks like the

RE: VLSM Question [7:35827]

2002-02-24 Thread Larry Letterman
, February 24, 2002 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VLSM Question [7:35827] So does it mean on the first subent - the host range is 192.168.50.1 - 192.168.50.126, and the second subnet host range is 192.168.50.129 - 192.168.50.254? Best Regards, Hunt Lee G Z wrote in message [EMAIL

RE: VLSM Question [7:35827]

2002-02-19 Thread John McCartney
As for VLSM, I found an example in Jeff Doyle (TCP/IP Vol 1) on p290 that I don't understand. 192.168.50.0 /25, and it states that the reason it has /25 is because it needs to have 100 hosts = so 2^7-2=126 hosts (as 2^6 would be too small), so it makes sense. What confuses me is that since

Re: VLSM Question [7:35827]

2002-02-19 Thread Annlee Hines
Don't think of the Class C at allif you have a /25, that means that, of the 32 bits in the address, the most significant 25 represent the network address. Dotted decimal notation is for human convenience, nothing more. The address is a string of binary digits coming over the wire, and it is

RE: VLSM Question [7:35827]

2002-02-18 Thread G Z
The 25 bit can be 0 or 1. It looks like the book chose 0. The CCNA books use 2^n - 2 for both hosts and subnets. But you also can use the zero and one subnet so that would add 2. Then you would have 2^n for subnets. So, 192.168.50.0 is one, and 192.168.50.128 is another subnet. Using the first

RE: VLSM Question [7:35827]

2002-02-18 Thread G Z
Sorry about the oversight: 192.168.50.0001 first host 192.168.50.0110 last host should be: 192.168.50.0111 broadcast Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35832t=35827 -- FAQ, list archives, and