RE: VOIP and VOFR

2000-05-11 Thread Stull, Cory
VOIP is more overhead due to the fact that it is at layer 3 and frame relay at layer 2. If you can do frame relay voice over that is the better way to do it but voice over ip is more flexible. Meaning that if you have some sites that aren't frame relay and some that are VOIP might be the way to

RE: VOIP and VOFR

2000-05-11 Thread Daniel Cotts
As best that I can remember: The voice packets over VOIP have IP addresses and are routable. The voice packets in VOFR do not have IP addresses and as such can traverse only the FR link. VOIP can be run over FR links. See: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/index.shtml Where they use VOFR to ref

Re: VOIP and VOFR

2000-05-11 Thread Joe Pinkus
VoFR is layer two, L2 encapsulation, less overhead per call VoIP is layer three, uses H.323, L3 encapsulation, larger overhead This of course is just a nut shell difference between the two. Oscar Rau wrote: > Hi, > > How different is VOIP and VOFR? I thought IP networks are possible over Fram

Re: VoIP and VoFR integration [7:3765]

2001-05-09 Thread Patrick Donlon
Do both customers have existing VoIP and VoFR networks and what sort of equipment do they use? If you can connect on an IP level you should be able to use h323 as common protocol between the two systems. Otherwise you may want to look at some sort of Clearing house solution. Cheers Pat wrote