I'm not sure if this is exactly what you are referring to Craig, but it
might help. We also have had problems doing VPN Client connections behind
PAT. Its only in places where the DSL/Cable router cannot support PAT on
unknown ports, like UDP 1 which is default for VPN 3000 connections.
Lin
: RE: VPN Design ? [7:45927]
I'm not referring to a strictly static NAT setup. I'm talking about
dynamic NAT/PAT, where clients may get a NAT address or may use PAT,
depending on pool availability.
For example, I had a location that was dropping connections on the PIX and
I couldn&#x
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
>
>This isn't really the case. It can be a bit more difficult to setup the
>clients behind a NAT device, but it is entirely possible.
>In many cases it's as easy as forcing UDP encapsulation on the server
ehind a NAT device, but it is entirely possible.
In many cases it's as easy as forcing UDP encapsulation on the server
side...
Good luck,
-Original Message-
From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VPN
"In order for the few PCs in the remote office to have access to the main
office servers, do I even need to build a tunnel since they have no
firewall?"
Whether to setup a vpn tunnel or not is dictated by your business needs and
the types of services you want the remote office to access, not by
5 matches
Mail list logo
