Re: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-21 Thread Brian
The address spaces seem to be nonoverlapping, so rearranging would seem to provide no benefit. I have always used the unapply, edit in another window, then reapply after getting the lines in there, or usinf tftp in the case of a lengthy list. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportun

RE: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-17 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
] >"The Mind is a Terrible thing to Waste!" > > >-----Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Scott Meyer >Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 7:44 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: access list rearrange? [7:861]

RE: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-17 Thread Ken Claussen
CTED] "The Mind is a Terrible thing to Waste!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Meyer Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: access list rearrange? [7:861] Remember there is an implied deny

Re: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-17 Thread Gaz
255 > > > The 2 deny statements are not needed, don't do anything, and only add work > for the processor. > > Scott Meyer > CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, etc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of &

RE: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-17 Thread Scott Meyer
needed, don't do anything, and only add work for the processor. Scott Meyer CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, etc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tolanid Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: access

Re: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-16 Thread Bob Timmons
Maybe he was referring to the access-list vs access-group statements? The access-list statements are entered first, but in the 'sh run', it shows them after the access-group statements. I've never seen a router rearrange an access-list. He's right, though, about the implicit permit/deny. I che

Re: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-16 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, I don't think the IOS reorders access-lists after all what if it was required in the order it is. eg deny some addresses then permit any. Teunis Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Monday, April 16, 2001 at 08:45:39 PM, Scott Meyer wrote: > I was reading Sybex's old ACRC book. One of the study

Re: access list rearrange? [7:861]

2001-04-16 Thread Tolanid
Scott - my experience has been that access lists are NEVER re-arranged. I would not believe the book. I have the book you are talking about - I'll refer the errata for the book from their website (if they have it). But, again, my understanding is - the IOS will never re-arrange the access list