Birdy,
What about the interface buffer that has to cope with buffering the packets.
Just because you've got 100k left to deal with it doesn't necessarily mean
that the router can
HTH
Richard
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49003&t=49002
-
Possibly, but is anyone actually complaining about the
speed ?
Check the serial interface at your end also for
dropped packets, load, reliability etc over a period
of about a week. If that average is over 90% then you
may well do with an upgrade.
Phil.
--- birdy wrote: > Can anyone
tell me w
birdy wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me why
>
> I have 2 Mbps WAN connection that reached 95 % utilisation
> during peak time.
For how long was it at 95%? That would definitely worry me, unless it turned
out that "the peak" was just a few seconds or something.
> When I try to ping to my provid
Dear priscilla
Thanks for your reply :)
Wellthe 10% packet loss happen at the peak time...and that can happen
for a period of 3-4 hours
No packet loss was observed during off peak hours.
I rememeber reading something on a cisco article which states that WAN
performance will worsen when it
Dear Phil
Thanks for the reply...:)
The below is from my router and it seems that both the tx and rx load is not
over 90% utilised.
reliability 255/255, txload 81/255, rxload 162/255
This reading is taken when my bandwidth usage is around 1.96Mbps. My pipe is
only 2Mbps. At this point in time,
5 matches
Mail list logo
