The key in the question is the word "classful". This is a Class B address
with a 16 bit classful mask. I would have to say the correct answer would
be 'C' 172.18.255.255.
Ed
> Using classful assumptions, what is the directed broadcast address for
> 172.18.2.0 with the mask 255.255.254.0?
> a) 1
At 04:28 PM 7/24/01, Ed Moss wrote:
>The key in the question is the word "classful".
Classful doesn't mean it has to end on an 8-bit boundary.
>This is a Class B address
>with a 16 bit classful mask.
It's not 16-bit. It says the mask is 255.255.254.0. That's 23 bits in the
prefix (network) par
f it being a computer or other host...
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:28 PM
>Subject: Re: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
>
>
> > At 04:28 PM 7/24/01, Ed Moss wrote:
> > >The key in t
>that theory of it being a computer or other host...
> >
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
> >To:
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:28 PM
> >Subject: Re: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
> >
> &g
be that... But the term Classful negates
>that theory of it being a computer or other host...
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:28 PM
>Subject: Re: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
>
>
> >
on classful, it understands its own
subnet
> > >mask, and then the answer would be that... But the term Classful negates
> > >that theory of it being a computer or other host...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From
his was an actual test question!!! If this was something
someone asked me off the top of my head, I would agree, but it is a
challenge question
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: RE: ccna challenge question [7
ng a computer or other host...
>>
>>
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
>>To:
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
>>
>>
>> > At 04:28 PM 7/24/01, Ed
then the answer would be that... But the term Classful negates
>that theory of it being a computer or other host...
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:28 PM
>Subject: Re: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
r thinking was at the time. I just checked my files--it wasn't
one of mine so I can't say one way or the other...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Guy Russell
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccn
e Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
The term "classful" could have been thrown in for two reasons. 1, as you
suggest, is to lead the reader to think about "classful". Do they
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:30 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
>
>
>The term "classful" could ha
Everyone has some good ideas on this... and one of the replies made me
rethink my previous answer Look at it from the aspect of the ROUTER...
assuming that this is implemented on a router.
An interface with the address of 172.18.2.0 and a mask of 255.255.254.0
will send directed broadcasts t
t of classful and classless routing.
-- Leigh Anne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ed Moss
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
Everyone has some good ideas on this
lf Of
Leigh Anne Chisholm
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
Ed, what you're forgetting is this: a directed broadcast would either be
generated by a device 172.18.2.0 network that has been configured with a
subn
riginal Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
one final belaborment of the point. ( where is Bob Vance, whose thoroughness
would be quite welcome here? )
observe the follo
Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 8:06 PM
To: Leigh Anne Chisholm; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ccna challenge question [7:13565]
one final belaborment of the point. ( where is Bob Vance, whose thoroughness
would be quite welcome here? )
o
17 matches
Mail list logo
