RE: cisco PIX firewall

2000-07-20 Thread Kent Hundley
PIX was designed from the beginning as a NAT gateway, but you can disable the use of NAT for your internal address ranges with the 'nat 0' command. Here's a link that shows an example using 'nat 0': http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/19.html -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: Cisco Pix Firewall 515

2001-01-23 Thread hao vu
1st thing I would do is to hit Cisco web site and search for the PIX info.; and understand the PIX functionality. Cisco site also has a great deal of tech and config details. HTH HV -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin O'Gilvie Sent:

Re: Cisco PIX firewall book [7:33216]

2002-01-25 Thread Richard Deal
Sam, The book is pretty much a direct port from the CSPFA 2.0 class. The new class, 2.1, is now out and it does have some minor changes. One that I remember is that 2.0 talks a lot about WebSense but 2.1 doesn't. I was somewhat disappointed with this book, considering that the MCNS book was a pr

Re: Cisco PIX firewall book [7:33216]

2002-01-25 Thread Don Claybrook
I have the book and I also attended the PIX course he teaches for Global Knowledge. I think the book covers everything it needs to, but even if it didn't, it's the only game in town. - Original Message - From: "sam sneed" To: Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:40 AM Subject: Cisco PIX f

RE: Cisco PIX firewall book [7:33216]

2002-01-25 Thread Ali, Abbas
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco PIX firewall book [7:33216] Sam, The book is pretty much a direct port from the CSPFA 2.0 class. The new class, 2.1, is now out and it does have some minor changes. One that I remember is that 2.0 talks a lot about WebSense but 2.1 doesn't. I wa

Re: Cisco PIX firewall book [7:33216]

2002-01-26 Thread ipguru1
book seems to be pretty decent, but I have to admit, Ali is right. The manual that comes with a 515 is pretty good at getting right into what you need. Not very hard to read and has good examples. The Chapman book is a lot like the manual. bk sam sneed wrote: > Has anyone read the Cisco Secu