Christopher A.; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: interface stats, physical problem or high utilization?
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I think I have mustered enough evidence
to change my co-worker's viewpoint.
By the way, the problem was physical (telco) related. I found
000 8:38 PM
To: Kane, Christopher A.; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: interface stats, physical problem or high utilization?
At 09:59 AM 12/26/00, Kane, Christopher A. wrote:
>I'm looking for some feedback to a discussion I had with a co-worker. I'm
>not looking for
At 09:59 AM 12/26/00, Kane, Christopher A. wrote:
>I'm looking for some feedback to a discussion I had with a co-worker. I'm
>not looking for troubleshooting assistance with this problem. Rather, I
>would like to know if anyone else has experienced a similar situation in
>which a utilization probl
You need to look into the following things in this particular scenario:
1. The output queue drops on the serial interface and if they increase
during the file transfer.
2. The queueing type configured on the interface such as WFQ, FIFO, etc.
3. The "buffers" situation in terms of
You need to look into the following things in this particular scenario:
1. The output queue drops on the serial interface and if they increase
during the file transfer.
2. The queueing type configured on the interface such as WFQ, FIFO, etc.
3. The "buffers" situation in terms of
5 matches
Mail list logo
