PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: max number of letters?
[7:48586]
Sent
by:
nobody@groups
yes. yes I should... =)
Mike W.
"Chuck" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> shouldn't you be studying and optimizing your alias exec list? ;->
>
>
> ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I can't see there would
shouldn't you be studying and optimizing your alias exec list? ;->
""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I can't see there would be an RFC on how many letters can be used,
> especially since acronyms have been used far longer than the acronym RFC
h
Michael Williams wrote:
> I can't see there would be an RFC on how many letters can be used,
> especially since acronyms have been used far longer than the acronym
> has been around
This may be true. However, one should exercise care in regard to MTU
in avian systems. The RFC specifical
>I can't see there would be an RFC on how many letters can be used,
>especially since acronyms have been used far longer than the acronym RFC has
>been around Here's like an incredibly long acronym: (this URL
>*will* wrap)
>
>http://acronyms.co.nz/cgi-bin/gonym?HERE%27S+TO+THE+CRAZY+ONES+
I can't see there would be an RFC on how many letters can be used,
especially since acronyms have been used far longer than the acronym RFC has
been around Here's like an incredibly long acronym: (this URL
*will* wrap)
http://acronyms.co.nz/cgi-bin/gonym?HERE%27S+TO+THE+CRAZY+ONES+%2D+TH
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> Is there an RFC that limits the number of letters you can have in an
acronym
> or am I just blonde today?
>
> --
> RFC 1149 Compliant
I believe the limit for avian transport systems is three, possibly
four, letters, although it is reported that five or even six have b
7 matches
Mail list logo