Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
> Couldn't you just use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255 to deny
> 192.17.73.0 -
> 192.17.77.0? I used the Boson wildcard mask calculator to
> check this, and
> it gave me those networks.
If the mask is 0.0.4.255, it will deny 192.17.73.0 as well as 192.17.77.0.
However, it wo
I replied too and it wasn't posted. That is SO annoying. I'm tempted to
never post again.
Anyway, your answer is wrong because it doesn't catch 74, 75, and 76, and he
said he wanted a range.
You have to use 0.0.7.255, which has an unfortunate (but unavoidable) side
effect of catching 72, and 78 a
I replied earlier, but it didn't seem to come through. Anyway, you should
use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255. That will match the addresses
192.17.73.0 - 192.172.77.255, which I think is what you want. In case you
don't already have it, download Boson's free wildcard mask calculator at the
followin
Couldn't you just use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255 to deny 192.17.73.0 -
192.17.77.0? I used the Boson wildcard mask calculator to check this, and
it gave me those networks.
""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> the first access-list will not work.
> The second one will als
the first access-list will not work.
The second one will also deny networks 192.17.72.0 and 78.0 as well as 79.0
-
You are correct about zeros must make at 1's are don't care, but you need to
understand the basic of subnetting. A 248.0 subnet mask means 8 "Class C"
subnets. You have to start at a
5 matches
Mail list logo
