my appologies.
i always presumed it worked in the same way as unix-HA...
thanks for the correction
steve
From: Kent Hundley
Reply-To: Kent Hundley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:52:32 -0400
Stephen,
Your statement is incorrect
`m told ther is a way around this but you will have to search the
archives...it was only a couple of weeks ago
Cheers
steve
From: Jim Bond
Reply-To: Jim Bond
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:15:07 -0400
I have to disagree. The standby router
and just re-confirmed it in
my lab.
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stephen Skinner
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]
i have to diasgreeevery 3 secs a pulse is sent
Standby is stanby, it doesn't do any routing until the active router goes
down.
Regards,
Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: policy route [7:21044]
Hello,
I have 2 routers
I have to disagree. The standby router has static
route point to the other side. Once traffic gets to
standby, it should route...
Jim
--- Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
wrote:
Standby is stanby, it doesn't do any routing until
the active router goes
down.
Regards,
Mark,
-Original
5 matches
Mail list logo