Re: simple access-lists question [7:36240]

Not enought customers have asked for that feature yet. :) Was RFC 1149 the precursor to wireless? ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey, are you ever going to upgrade to RFC 2549 compliance? If you > haven't already, you're behind the times by

RE: simple access-lists question [7:36240]

Your syntax is wrong. You are permitting IP protocols 80, 21, 23 and 53 - NOT ports 80, 21, 23 and 53. The correct syntax would be: access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq ftp access-list 101 permit tcp any any

Re: simple access-lists question [7:36240]

Hey, are you ever going to upgrade to RFC 2549 compliance? If you haven't already, you're behind the times by about three years! :-) John >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 2/22/02 11:43:33 AM >>> I believe you need something like access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www you have something that permit

Re: simple access-lists question [7:36240]

I believe you need something like access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www you have something that permits IP protocol numbers I think. Like 6 is tcp, 17 is udp, 9 is igrp, etc.. etc... -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""NetEng"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Why