RE: udld [7:73730]

2003-08-08 Thread Walker, James - Is
All the time. It is our standard to run udld in agressive mode. Jim -Original Message- From: Lopez, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: udld [7:73730] Anyone out there make it a common practice to implement UDLD on Cat 6

RE: udld [7:73730]

2003-08-10 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Absolutely! I have a client that uses UDLD Aggressive Mode on all switch-to-switch Gig links. We found out about this the hard way when we had a SUP in a 6509 that had faulty GIG interface; after several spanning-tree "events" and high-level conf. calls with Cisco they informed us about this feat

RE: udld [7:73730]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did some reading and you do not want to run any sw-sw fiber without it! Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Lopez, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 augustus 2003 16:00 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: udld [7:73730] Anyone out there make it a common practice t

RE: udld [7:73730]

2003-08-14 Thread Salvatore De Luca
Yes, I find it to be a very good practice.. you should also activate the "aggressive" mode. Normal UDLD takes 90 seconds to bring down a UDLD link. Aggressive mode will bring it down in 15 seconds. Here is a good link on "Best Practices" for Catalyst Switches.. http://packetstormsecurity.nl/defcon