I know the reason for two of three.
1) Why is the Ethernet minimum frame size of 64 bytes?
Ethernet timing is based upon "bit time" the time a bit takes to travel the
distance of an maximum Ethernet segment length 100m or 328 ft. The minimum
frame size 64 bytes equals 512 bits or 512 bit time
t;Reply-To: "David L. Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: why there is an ethernet frame size limitation
>Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:28:31 -0500
>
>I know the reason for two of three.
>
>1) Why is the Ethernet minimum frame size of 64
Azhar. Buy a book! or use a search engine. This stuff is out there
Ethernet Frame Size.
64bytes*8bits/10M = 50uS
knock off a bit for 2 repeaters, e.g. 10uS per repeater = 30uS
x signal propagation (glass/copper = 2/3*c = 2m/s) = 6000m
/ 2 to get a return path
= 300
At 02:28 PM 1/24/01, David L. Blair wrote:
>I know the reason for two of three.
>
>1) Why is the Ethernet minimum frame size of 64 bytes?
>
>Ethernet timing is based upon "bit time" the time a bit takes to travel the
>distance of an maximum Ethernet segment length 100m or 328 ft.
Don't get me st
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: January 24, 2001 3:10 PM
To: David L. Blair; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why there is an ethernet frame size limitation
At 02:28 PM 1/24/01, David L. Blair wrote:
>I know the reason for two of three.
>
>1) Why is the Ether
es2.htm
Priscilla
> -- Leigh Anne
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>Sent: January 24, 2001 3:10 PM
>To: David L. Blair; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: why there is an ethernet
anted less than 32 bytes or it
> would need echo suppressors) which I'm sure made everyone evenly upset.
>
> >>>Brian
>
> >From: "David L. Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "David L. Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EM
7 matches
Mail list logo
