Without knowing why you originally chose to run both RIP and IGRP, I can't
tell you exactly what the trade-offs might be. Unless you have some other
non-Cisco devices (like Unix boxes) that need to listen to RIP updates, why
not turn off both RIP and IGRP and then only run EIGRP? You wouldn't ha
Thanks John! It starts to make sense to me know! Is it possible to take
out RIP and just run EIGRP without "passive-interface" and "redistribute"?
If so what's the trade off? Again Thanks for the help!
"John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTE
If I understand your topology, the problem is that you are running RIP and
IGRP with a discontiguous classfull network. Let me rephrase that.
It appears that your network looks like this:
A 10.1.0.0 - 192.168.10.0 -- B 10.2.0.0
RIP and IGRP cannot pass subnet mask information
them how
to
redistributed...
HTH
Nigel..
- Original Message -
From: Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: RIP does not advertise in IGRP - what's wrong?
> using eigrp in y
using eigrp in your network 10.0.0.0 instead.
turn on auto-summary.
probably you can ping.
""Thomas"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó
99k20t$s6p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99k20t$s6p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All - In my network enviroment, I have LANs with 10.x.0.0/16 networks
and
> WAN with 192.16
Hi All - In my network enviroment, I have LANs with 10.x.0.0/16 networks and
WAN with 192.168.10.0/24. I use RIP for LAN and IGRP for WAN. On RIP, I
redistribute IGRP, and vice versa, on IGRP I redistribute RIP. However, I
cannot ping from one LAN to the other LAN. If I put a static route to
s
6 matches
Mail list logo
