Re: ICMP Redirects

2001-03-14 Thread Edward Solomon
You've really only got a few options available: (1) Proxy ARP (2) ICMP Redirects (3) ICMP Router Discovery Protocol (4) Run a routing protocol on the workstations (5) Hot Standby Router Protocol Of these, (4) is probably the least desirable, (3) is the least widely supported and (5), as you

Re: Re: ICMP Redirects

2001-03-14 Thread Paul Werner
A couple of more thoughts on the issue of ICMP redirects. First, Edward Solomon had a pretty good concise analysis of the options available in the environment you have and the advantages and disadvantages to each: (1) Proxy ARP (2) ICMP Redirects (3) ICMP Router Discovery Protocol (4)

Re: ICMP Redirects

2001-03-13 Thread Muhammed Khalilullah
You can use the command 'no ip redirects' command on the Interface configuration mode. Muhammad Khalilulah CCNP, MCSE --- John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When a host receives an ICMP redirect, it's my understanding that it places a host route in the routing table for that

Re: ICMP redirects

2000-10-09 Thread Dale Holmes
I simply left them alone. Dale [=`) From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Paul Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED],"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ICMP redirects Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 13:00:11 -0700 At 01:

Re: Re: ICMP redirects

2000-10-09 Thread Paul Werner
On Mon, 09 Oct 2000, Priscilla Oppenheimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: What does it mean to plumb host routes? I couldn't decode what Microsoft is attempting to say in this article. If you can explain it, that would be great. (The other articles did make sense. Thanks for the URLs.) I

Re: ICMP redirects

2000-10-09 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 9 Oct 2000 16:04:13 -0400, Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :At 01:59 AM 10/9/00, Paul Werner wrote: : :Listed above is what the Internet Standard specifies for proper :operation. Let's bounce that against reality as we know it: :

Re: ICMP Redirects

2000-08-29 Thread Dale Holmes
Well, it's true, there is really no way for them to know that the link came back up. However, depending on the host, there is also no guarantee that they will ever heed the redirect in the first place. You really cannot count on them for fault tolerance. An HSRP solution would probably work

Re: ICMP Redirects

2000-08-29 Thread John Neiberger
HSRP didn't even occur to me, but since the DSL router we're using is a 675 that can't do HSRP, that isn't even an option. Bummer! That would have worked very well in this situation. Thanks John Well, it's true, there is really no way for them to know that the link came back up.

Re: ICMP Redirects

2000-08-29 Thread Roger Dellaca
I think HSRP could really handle this well - but with redirect - I haven't tried this, but... : static route out T1, floating static to other router, so it is only in the route table when the T1 goes down, if it sends out the same interface it will forward the packet send back ICMP redirect.

Re: ICMP Redirects

2000-08-29 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr
You could install different metric's in the routing tables so that if the T-1 comes backup that route will be used Duck - Original Message - From: John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:23 AM Subject: ICMP Redirects We have a situation

Re: ICMP Redirects

2000-08-29 Thread John Neiberger
I understand your point, but our primary reason for having a backup line is in case the main circuit goes down, not in case the actual router goes down. I was attempting to figure out a way to do poor-man's HSRP. For DSL, we'll be using a Cisco 675 which can't do HSRP. Thanks, John On Tue,