Robert,
Ok... I think we all at one time beat our heads on those
"work stations" came close to going mad on this one... Welcome to the
club.. think policy-based routing at the hub
HTH
Nigel
- Original Message -
From: McCallum, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
You are on the right track.
Router 3 does need to be the DR but router's 4 and 5 need to
NOT be a BDR. Also you will need neighbor statements. You
can put the priority on the neighbor statement.
So router 1 has a priority of say 90 and routers 4 and 5 have
a priority of 0 to keep them from
CTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/08/01 08:03 AM
Please respond to Kevin Mahler
To: "'Ccielab' (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
(E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: OSPF and frame relay issues
You are on the ri
5:03 AM
To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
Subject:RE: OSPF and frame relay issues
You are on the right track.
Router 3 does need to be the DR but router's 4 and 5 need to
NOT be a BDR. Also you will need neighbor statements. You
can put the priority
dy. Com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: OSPF and frame relay issues
This brings to mind a question I have about the neighbor priority statement.
According to the Doc CD, the default value for neighbor priority is 0
I have on a couple of recent labs entered neighbor a.b.c.d and when doing a
show run seen th
5 matches
Mail list logo
