Tony,
What are you using as your vpn end point, a pix / concentrator ? With the
two you will need to create a static map in the nat table to direct the vpn
client request to the proper device behind the nat table. you need the ike
client to perform this with win 2k, I have this working into a
>
>> >I have a requirement to run a VPN for remote access and NAT for the
>> entire
>> >LAN. I would prefer to run the one or the other on the router.
>> >Does anyone have any suggestions as to which? I am also currently
>> running
>> >BGP. My opinion is to run the VPN on the router and NA
"Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have a requirement to run a VPN for remote access and NAT for the
> entire
> >LAN. I would prefer to run the one or the other on the router.
> >Does anyone have any suggestions as to which? I am also currently
> running
> >BGP. My o
>I have a requirement to run a VPN for remote access and NAT for the entire
>LAN. I would prefer to run the one or the other on the router.
>Does anyone have any suggestions as to which? I am also currently running
>BGP. My opinion is to run the VPN on the router and NAT on another box
>therby
create subinterfaces and place nat only on the internet link. This works
fine
-Original Message-
From: Robert Yee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 July 2000 06:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VPN and NAT
Denao,
Have yo tried the NONAT statement in your access lists? I am by
:
Sent by: Subject: Re: VPN and NAT
nobody@groups
Denao,
Have yo tried the NONAT statement in your access lists? I am by no means an
expert, but here's a link to a cisco sample configs. There are a bunch nearthe
bottom about IPsec, NAT and NONAT.
Denao Ruttino wrote:
> I have set up a router that is doing a router-router VPN as well as VPN
> c
7 matches
Mail list logo
