Re: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380]

2001-06-29 Thread Allen May
al Message - From: "Mark Smith" To: "Allen May" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 11:41 AM Subject: Re: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380] > Thanks for the ideas, Allen. I'll probably just give that a try. I just am still not sure if, once I bring PIX1 back o

Re: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380]

2001-06-29 Thread Mark Smith
; doesn't load the > config so you can manually give it an IP, subnet, > gateway, and tftp server > address. Without the config loaded it won't be part > of the failover. > > Allen > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Smith" > To: >

Re: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380]

2001-06-29 Thread Sam
ailover. > > Allen > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Smith" > To: > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 1:53 AM > Subject: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380] > > > > This may be a stupid question but that's never stopped me from asking

Re: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380]

2001-06-29 Thread Allen May
ly give it an IP, subnet, gateway, and tftp server address. Without the config loaded it won't be part of the failover. Allen - Original Message - From: "Mark Smith" To: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 1:53 AM Subject: Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380] > This m

Recommendations on PIX upgrade [7:10380]

2001-06-28 Thread Mark Smith
This may be a stupid question but that's never stopped me from asking before. At one site I have 2 UR 515's running in failover config. They are at 5.2(1) software. I'd like to upgrade them but can only afford an absolute minimum of down time (measured in seconds, maybe). From what I've read abou