It's very possible to misconfigure a network!!!
Dave
McHugh Randy wrote:
>
> I have an OC3 ATM WAN link that connect two LANs, but there are two
> identical subnets /30 on either side of the WAN link. Has any one ever had
> that type of setup and how is that possible with two identical public
It's more of a stop-gap than a long-term solution:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/3.htmlMcHugh Randy wrote:
>
> I have an OC3 ATM WAN link that connect two LANs, but there are
> two identical subnets /30 on either side of the WAN link. Has
> any one ever had that type of setup and how is t
It's more of a stop-gap than a long-term solution:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/3.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53976&t=53973
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/l
I read about an almost identical (if not actually identical) issue on
Cisco's website. The solution they gave was to do NAT on one side of the
WAN link.
""McHugh Randy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have an OC3 ATM WAN link that connect two LANs, but there
I have an OC3 ATM WAN link that connect two LANs, but there are two
identical subnets /30 on either side of the WAN link. Has any one ever had
that type of setup and how is that possible with two identical public IP /30
subnets on either side of WAN connection?
Here are the interfaces on either s
5 matches
Mail list logo
