Secondary addresses on fast ethernet interfaces [7:52295]

2002-08-29 Thread McHugh Randy
All, Does anyone know if using a seconday interface on fast ethernet 0/0 on a 7204 will degrade perfomance on the network for the primary interface? I have to route a a different subnet on a LAN and cannot do it without creating a secondary interace? for instance interface FastEthernet0/0 ip add

Re: Secondary addresses on fast ethernet interfaces [7:52295]

2002-08-29 Thread Darrell Newcomb
Short answer would be not unless the volume of data was a problem or the new configuration caused packets to be switched(proccess, ...) in a different manner than before. I think you want to do: int fa0/0 ip addr 205.109.29.x(where x is >128) 255.255.255.128 ip addr 205.109.29.33 255.255.255.224

Re: Secondary addresses on fast ethernet interfaces [7:52295]

2002-08-29 Thread MADMAN
Though I'm not sure how the nonsensical static route would alleviate the need for a secondary the secondary interface shouldn't be much of an issue. Of coarse I'm assuming your not adding a secondary network with 500 hosts. "ip route-cache same-interface" is useful if routing between the prima