Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]

I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes learned dynamically. I've also learned that the exception to this rule is that floating static routes can take a back seat to dynamic routes. (Please feel free to beat me about the head if I'm wrong on this one. It will only help me i

Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]

A typical static route will have an AD of 1, or possibly even 0 if it's pointing directly to an interface. A floating static would have an AD higher than whatever routing protocol you're running. If you see statics in the table with high ADs then those are likely "floating". HTH, John >>> "Tod

Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]

Look at the config. A floating static will have a metric higher than that of the dynamic which makes it "float" or not injected into the routing table unless the dynamically learned route is lost. Dave Todd Carswell wrote: > > I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes le

Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]

Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059] Sent by: nobody@groups

Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]

be seen in the routing table as a static route rather than directly connected. regards Andy - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:34 PM Subject: Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059] > Todd, > > A standard static route has an admin

Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]

> If I'm looking at the routing table in a router that I did not configure, > how can I know that a static route is a floating static route and not just a > "run-o-the-mill" static route? > S network/masklength [AD/METRIC] how-connected, where AD is administrative distance by the administrative