I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes learned
dynamically. I've also learned that the exception to this rule is that
floating static routes can take a back seat to dynamic routes. (Please feel
free to beat me about the head if I'm wrong on this one. It will only help
me i
A typical static route will have an AD of 1, or possibly even 0 if it's
pointing directly to an interface. A floating static would have an AD
higher than whatever routing protocol you're running. If you see
statics in the table with high ADs then those are likely "floating".
HTH,
John
>>> "Tod
Look at the config. A floating static will have a metric higher than
that of the dynamic which makes it "float" or not injected into the
routing table unless the dynamically learned route is lost.
Dave
Todd Carswell wrote:
>
> I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes le
Static Routes vs. Dynamic
Routes [7:25059]
Sent
by:
nobody@groups
be seen in the routing table as a static route rather than
directly connected.
regards
Andy
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]
> Todd,
>
> A standard static route has an admin
> If I'm looking at the routing table in a router that I did not configure,
> how can I know that a static route is a floating static route and not just
a
> "run-o-the-mill" static route?
>
S network/masklength [AD/METRIC] how-connected, where AD is administrative
distance
by the administrative
6 matches
Mail list logo