I don't get it.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless (partial retraction)
>
> Nope, 'cause blonde (with the &#
at it doesn't understand and say 'I don't get it. Go away.'.
Thus...blonde ACLs.
- Original Message -
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: The Finale: OSPF and IP Cla
Nope, 'cause blonde (with the 'e') refers for female routing engineers. Or,
rather, females in general. But be wary even using to refer to females..
"Usage Note: It is usual in English to treat blond as if it required gender
marking, as in French, spelling it blonde when referring to women and
>I'm blonde. I don't get it.
Does that mean that the reason that (male) blonde routing engineers
get better as they age, not from experience but from male pattern
baldness?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
I'm blonde. I don't get it.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Vance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CISCO_GroupStudy List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless (partia
etwork Control Tech
Router Ops Center/Hilliard NOC
UUNET
(614)723-7877
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless (partial retraction)
Gee
ield Dr.
Fax 770-623-3429 Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Finale: OSPF and IP Clas
Geez, you're right. I'm starting to miss the forest because I've looked
at too many trees!
Yes, even in my experiments, I now remember seeing that the router
would pick a supernet route for a specific major network. Others
pointed this out to me and I had completely forgotten that particular
po
Actually, John my treatises :) on this subject a year ago showed this.
ip classless
*only* affects the lookups *outside* the classful aggregate. Any
supernet *within* the classful aggregate *will* be used, even with
no ip classless
set.
Thus, a learned route, 10.1.0.0/16 , will be used fo
than
generically relating to a supernet.
Regards,
Srikanth.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:09 AM
Subject: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless
> If you thought this behavior was odd bef
is closely tied with the default route, rather
than
generically relating to a supernet.
Regards,
Srikanth.
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:09 AM
Subject: The Finale: OSPF and IP Cl
iginal Message -
From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:09 AM
Subject: The Finale: OSPF and IP Classless
> If you thought this behavior was odd before, this will really bake your
> noodle. I did some more experiments a
If you thought this behavior was odd before, this will really bake your
noodle. I did some more experiments as we discussed in the thread earlier
today. Here's another short recap to catch everyone up.
I have two routers, A and B, running OSPF. The link between them is
10.1.1.0/24, and A is
13 matches
Mail list logo
