UDP Header

2000-10-06 Thread FRS
Can a UDP Header be fragmented? And if yes, how is it fragmented? **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-06 Thread FRS
Excuse me. I meant to ask if a UDP Packet can be fragmented and what happens to the UDP Header if it can be fragmented? Thanks. ""FRS"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8rm9i2$kte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8rm9i2$kte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can a UDP Header

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-06 Thread Brad Nixon
First, the PDU for UDP is segment, not packet. Correct? ""FRS"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8rm9i2$kte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8rm9i2$kte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can a UDP Header be fragmented? And if yes, how is it fragmented? > > > **NOTE

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-07 Thread FRS
"ElephantChild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, FRS wrote: > > > Excuse me. I meant to ask if a UDP Packet can be fragmented > > Yes. > > > and what happens > > to the UDP Header if it can be fr

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-07 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Only the first fragment has the UDP header in it. After that it's just an IP header and data. Every IP fragment has the same identification number in the IP header. An offset field in the IP header says where in the datastream each fragment fits. So to help you understand this, study t

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-07 Thread FRS
Ms. Oppenheimer and everyone, Thank you for your help, it is much appreciated. "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Only the first fragment has the UDP header in it. After that it's just a

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-07 Thread FRS
; > > On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, FRS wrote: > > > > > > > and what happens > > > > to the UDP Header if it can be fragmented? > > > > > > Nothing. It's sent unchanged in the first fragment. The only header that > > > gets modified and

Re: UDP Header

2000-10-08 Thread Ejay Hire
Yes. The UDP Header/Data can be fragmented. Part of the Idea behind the OSI model of Netwrking is that Layer 4 traffic doesn't care what the lower layer portocols do to the Data/segments/packets/frames/bits, as long as when it reaches Layer 4 on the destination host it looks The same as

TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Thomas Peroutka
Hi Guys, just reading a book and saw pictures of TCP and UDP headers. Whereas the UDP header has a length field describing the length of the UDP segment including data and header, I can´t see such a field in TCP. Is this an error of the book or how does TCP determine the length of the segment

Re: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Phil Barker
> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > just reading a book and saw pictures of TCP and UDP > headers. Whereas > the UDP header has a length field describing the > length of the UDP > segment including data and header, I can´t see such > a field in TCP. > Is this an error of the book

Re: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>The length isn't explicitly transmitted but is >computed via the Sequence Number and Ack Number. > >RFC 793 has more detail. > >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc793.html > >Regards, > >Phil. > >PS: There are some talented women on this site !! >"Guy" Excellent answer! I was about to go check the

Re: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr
M Subject: Re: TCP/ UDP header > The length isn't explicitly transmitted but is > computed via the Sequence Number and Ack Number. > > RFC 793 has more detail. > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc793.html > > Regards, > > Phil. > > PS: There are some talente

Re[2]: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Thomas Peroutka
wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> just reading a book and saw pictures of TCP and UDP >> headers. Whereas >> the UDP header has a length field describing the >> length of the UDP >> segment including data and header, I can´t see such >> a field in TCP. >> Is th

Re: Re[2]: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Phil Barker
93 has more detail. > > PB> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc793.html > > PB> Regards, > > PB> Phil. > > PB> PS: There are some talented women on this site > !! > PB> "Guy" > > PB> --- Thomas Peroutka > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g