I think that is the best way. First migrate to local Vlans and after use
Server/Client.
While in Lane you could also use a big domain, with two central switches as
the servers and all the others as clients, but I think your solution is
better.
Message Posted at:
Like most networking problems it depends. How large is your switch domain?
Are you doing End to End VLANs or Local? How large is your STP domain now?
Will it grow larger? Here a link I would start with
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/21.html ( stater for VTP)
then hit this one
Depending on the size of the network VTP is being deployed, you can divide
the VTP domain into geograhical area or sites that would decrease the VTP
traffic.
From: Zim
Date: 2002/11/19 Tue AM 07:01:02 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650
: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VTP modes Server/Client vs Transparent [7:57650]
Like most networking problems it depends. How large is your switch domain?
Are you doing End to End VLANs or Local? How large is your STP domain now?
Will it grow larger? Here
Network is migrating from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. Transparent mode was
default VTP for all distribution layer switches. We had hubs for all access
layer switches. With the new migration to Gigabit switches would be at all
access layer buildings. Would it be beneficial to run transparent abroad or
5 matches
Mail list logo
