Re: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-05 Thread Patrick Donlon
Thanks for the comments, what they're doing is assigning a small number of vlans 2 to 3 on the switches and linking them, so no problems with VLAN 1 but obviously this approach doesn't scale cheers Pat Patrick Donlon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm familiar

Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread Patrick Donlon
I'm familiar with the concept off using vlan trunks to send vlan information to a connected switch, however I've been working on a new site and have discovered that they use a different approach. I was surprised to find that they just plug in the port off one switch straight into the next switch

RE: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread Bates, Steven (SIGNAL)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vlans and trunking [7:18442] I'm familiar with the concept off using vlan trunks to send vlan information to a connected switch, however I've been working on a new site and have discovered that they use

Re: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread Karen E Young
Kell is right about things being a mess later on. The default vlan is VLAN 1, which carries the protocol control traffic for a switched network. Things like STP BPDU's, DTP (ISL and dot1q), VTP, PAgP, etc... In addition, if the management interfaces are set to VLAN 1 (the default), then

RE: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Mays
Another problem with this approach is that you can't do Fast EtherChannel between the switches if you're not using trunks. Also, this will inhibit VLAN propagation. It's better all around to use the correct Cisco technique for trunking switches. Message Posted at:

Re: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread Michael L. Williams
Then they're only x-mitting the traffic for one VLAN.. (which ever VLAN the port is in on the one switch)... If they're only using VLAN 1 (default for all ports) then you can use this method because trunks are only needed for multiple VLANs. Mike W. Patrick Donlon wrote in message

Re: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread Michael L. Williams
Why's this? I've configured FastEtherChannel without having to make the FEC a trunk but this was between a 5500 and a 7500.. have you more information for me to read indicating that you MUST make a FEC link a trunk to work properly between switches? As an aside: You don't always

Re: Vlans and trunking [7:18442]

2001-09-04 Thread MADMAN
You can too do etherchannel with a single VLAN though it's not as common. Dave Ken Mays wrote: Another problem with this approach is that you can't do Fast EtherChannel between the switches if you're not using trunks. Also, this will inhibit VLAN propagation. It's better all around