access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-23 Thread kaushalenders
hi , hi i have made a access list to restrict telnet on my router from other network but when i implemented on vty it was no working .Pls help the acesslist wass access-list 55 permit 202.157.78.0 0.0.0.128 line vty 0 4 access-class 55 in but it restricted the whole network Message Posted at:

Re: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-24 Thread Midnight Man
You should change the order of your commands Line vty 0 4 access-class 55 in access-list 55 permit 202.157.78.0 0.0.0.128 For sure it will run correctly gook luck MNM --- kaushalenders wrote: > hi , > hi i have made a access list to restrict telnet on > my router from other > network but when

Re: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-24 Thread Haydn Solomon
Remember that masks on standard access-lists are wildcard reverse masks. try using a mask of 255 like this access-list 55 permit 202.157.78.0 0.0.0.255 line vty 0 4 access-class 55 in I don't think the problem is the order of commands. --- Midnight Man wrote: > You should change the order of

Re: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-24 Thread EA Louie
ssage - From: "Haydn Solomon" To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:47 AM Subject: Re: access-list [7:17097] > Remember that masks on standard access-lists are > wildcard reverse masks. try using a mask of 255 like > this > > access-list 55 permit 202.157.78.0 0.0.0.255 >

RE: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-24 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
ccess? That would help isolate the problem. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Haydn Solomon Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: access-list [7:17097] Remember that masks on standard access-

RE: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-24 Thread Haydn Solomon
lm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:24 PM To: Haydn Solomon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kaushalenders Subject: RE: access-list [7:17097] 0.0.0.128 IS a wildcard mask. It just allows half of the IP addresses you allow using the mask you provided. The order of commands isn&#

Re: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-24 Thread Brian Whalen
The inverse mask on this is likely incorrect, if yoy want it to be for half a class c, you want 0.0.0.127 Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Midnight Man wrote: > You should change the order of your commands > Line vty 0 4 > access-class 55 in > ac

Re: access-list [7:17097]

2001-08-25 Thread kaushalenders
telnet my router none other than it will be allowed telnet my router thanx kaushalender - Original Message - From: "Haydn Solomon" To: ; ; "'kaushalenders'" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:16 PM Subject: RE: access-list [7:17097] > Yes I do agree that