* Why do I use Async 65? Because on the 2600, the aux line is async 65
(unlike on the 2500, where aux = async 1)
Check this out:
r1#show line
Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI Uses Noise Overruns Int
* 0 CTY -- --- 0 0 0/0
* Why do I use Async 65? Because on the 2600, the aux line is async 65
(unlike on the 2500, where aux = async 1)
This is because the 2600 can support up to 32 Async ports via. an NP. Cisco
have stopped the renumbering problem by statically allocating the aux port
to be + 1. The 3600 has
I connected one 2620 and one 2511 by AUX back to back without any problem.
Maybe you should consider the following:
What cable are you using? I'm using a Cisco console cable (rollover, black).
Try lowering the line speed. I'm using the default speed 9600, low but works
fine.
Try the clear line
You might just need to clear both lines. Clear line x Also are you using a
rollover cable?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anybody ever connected 2600 AUX ports back2back? [7:5844
er cable?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anybody ever connected 2600 AUX ports back2back? [7:5844]
Some thoughts -
Try putting in this command on your async interface: async
11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anybody ever connected 2600 AUX ports back2back? [7:5844]
Some thoughts -
Try putting in this command on your async interface: async default routing
Also what type of cable are you using? I've always used the cisco black
cable.
And try to hard-code the
So I'm trying to connect the AUX ports of 2 2610's back to back. I am
following a known procedure on CCO where you can connect 2500's AUX ports
back to back.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/auxback.html
So I follow exactly what they do. But it doesn't work. Maybe the problem
Well, now I've just tried back2back aux between a 2610 and a 2514. It still
doesn't work, exact same errors as before.
NRF wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
So I'm trying to connect the AUX ports of 2 2610's back to back. I am
following a known procedure on
Some thoughts -
Try putting in this command on your async interface: async default routing
Also what type of cable are you using? I've always used the cisco black
cable.
And try to hard-code the rxspeed and txspeed. I never trust auto-select.
Why are you using async65? Wouldn't it be async1?
NRF
9 matches
Mail list logo
